This is the last of my three Ordination Papers. This paper addresses my theology, which I will admit has radically changed–at least as far as how I would articulate certain aspects–since I dated The Bean. Working to speak of my faith with an atheist enriched my own sense of who God is and who God is not to me in a way unparalleled. Also, these papers needed to be reflect my own faith with integrity while also meeting the United Church of Christ’s expectations of a minister in full standing.
If you and I shared a pot of tea together, I would flesh out my vision of God first. I would tell you how I feel what we say about God is speculative and important–all at once. I would tell you about the room in my spirit for Jesus to be God in the same way you and I might be. I would tell you what I do not know and of all of my questions. I would also say much of what is here too. Although I resist the word “Christian” given the word means what we as human beings did with Jesus’ message for our own good and for our own evil, I still embrace following Jesus and the faith community I cherish. Mostly, I continue to want to live a life of radical discipleship, which for me means standing in solidarity with all those hanging on crosses right now: the disadvantaged worker; gays, lesbians, bi-sexual, and transgendered persons; those suffering for any number of reasons; persons–especially women–of colour; and the list goes on and on.
Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus,
who, though he was in the form of God,
did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited,
but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave,
being born in human likeness.
And being found in human form,
he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death—
even death on a cross.
Philippians 2:5-8
My theology begins and ends with Jesus. Even when the Omniscient Powerful Creator God and I are not on speaking terms, or I wonder how the Holy Spirit weaves together my life, Jesus and I remain in constant dialogue. As a young child Jesus became my dearest and closest friend, so I cannot really recall a time in my life when Jesus was not with me. My vision of Jesus is clear and pervades my day-to-day living. I see him everywhere. How many times have I felt Jesus lay down beside me as I curled up sobbing? How many times have I felt his hand encircle my own? How many times have I looked across the bed of a dying patient into his tear-filled eyes? How many times have I laughed to myself and heard his laughter fill my spirit? Jesus, his life, his ministry, his death, his resurrection, and his promise to be with us to the end of the age are woven into the fabric of my life. My faith in God is reliant on my vision of Jesus. The Philippians Hymn above captures my vision and understanding in much the same way that it did for those first followers of Jesus. Jesus is God. Jesus understood the path of humility leads to enlightenment. Jesus came to be a servant, yes, even a slave, to us—his most precious creation. The hymn tells us that being a human is not a sin, for even God has walked the human path of life. The roads of obedience, humility and love can and will lead to death on a cross. And what should we, as followers of Christ Jesus, do? We are called to “let the same mind be in [us]” that was in Jesus. We are called to the ethic of discipleship.
While at Duke Divinity School, I took a general theology class, as every seminarian does. I had two choices: 1) Dr. Geoffrey Wainwright, who would prepare me for taking the Methodist theology examinations; or 2) Dr. Mary McClintock-Fulkerson; who would not prepare me for the Methodist theology examinations. Another way to frame their fundamental difference is that Dr. Wainwright taught a systematic theology, whereas Dr. Fulkerson taught how to think about theology. I took Dr. Fulkerson, which was the obvious choice for a girl with deep Progressive Baptist roots, but my choice also proved to be of incalculable value. She taught us a grammar with which we could read anything theological and understand the assumptions, world view, moves and intentions of the author. The grammar then served as a way to not only catalogue a theological writing, e.g. “This writing is Postmodern because the author creates a dialogue between their present socio-cultural reality and eschatology;” but also as a way to uncover how theology can then be practiced. In other words, a written assertion about the nature of God has the end goal of changing practice—changing the way we do our relationship with God.
I spotlight her methodology because I want to create a diorama into how helpful her teaching continues to be for me in my life and ministry. I also want to illustrate how challenging her class was for me. My deep Baptist roots gave me a grammar that focused primarily on the Biblical record of the first church, the Bible itself and the problems of the daily Christian life. I was completely overwhelmed by the challenge to consider two millennia of Christian writings. This it not to say that I came to the table unaware or uneducated, but the wealth of writings did not necessarily have considerable weight with me. My upbringing in the church focused on my personal choices that would bring me closer in my relationship with God or would take me further away. I had no concept of being a part of a wider conversation evolving through time. Those theological writings I had been exposed to were easily put into categories. They either supported or challenged my own personal understanding of who God is and how God works or they did not and were disregarded. I wish to convey a certain element of flippancy because I see it in myself prior to being taught how to think theologically, and because I think much of Evangelical Christianity abdicates from the wider ecumenical theological conversation. Evangelicalism lends itself to a particular kind of independence because of the core value of a personal decision to choose to follow Christ over and above a communal understanding of faith. When one marries this value with Rugged American Individualism and the pervasive dis-ease we as Protestants have with anything written between the end of the Canon and 1517, when Luther nailed his theses to the Wittenberg church door, I see how much I was the product of my Evangelical nurturing and the suspicion of anything non-Biblical.
The Evangelical climate of my formative years, 1975-1990, was a period of rapid change. The beginning of that time saw the Hippies who claimed Jesus as their personal Savior take up social justice issues in a new way that their parents did not feel compelled to do. This generation was greatly influenced by the theologian Francis Schaeffer who ran a Christian commune in Switzerland called L’Abri. Schaeffer became close friends with C. Everett Koop, prior to his appointment by President Reagan as the Surgeon General, and this relationship would ultimately become paramount to Schaeffer’s legacy as the Patriarch of the Pro-Life Movement. But this is not where Schaeffer began. Schaeffer embraced the Hippie culture and their choice to “opt out” of society and embrace a more loving and peaceful path. In a seminal and legendary chapel service at Wheaton College, the intellectual hub of American Evangelical life, he told the students to see movies that challenged their assumptions, which was a big deal on a campus that almost came to blows over the showing of Bambi. He wanted them to engage the culture, to look at art, to read beatnik poetry, but his most disturbing call was to stop wrapping themselves in the American flag and become “World Christians.” Schaeffer was utterly progressive for his time and in relation to his contemporaries, but he was also consumed with panic over the legalization of abortion. Growing up during this time, I heard and saw the transformation of the central theological conversation move from a desire to help and nurture all people as an extension of sharing one’s faith to the necessity of Christians working to reverse Roe vs. Wade. Social justice had only one name, “abortion.” So, as I grew up and moved further and further away from the legalism of my Evangelical upbringing, further I also moved away from a communal conversation about God and how God works in the world.
Seminary not only gave me the challenge to absorb the content of thousands of years of writings, but also provided an invitation to think of the theological conversation extending back through time as being relevant to me and calling me to be a part of it. My response to the sheer plethora of writings and the divergent viewpoints, so many of which raised important issues to me, was to become deeply troubled. Did I believe in God or in a bunch of other failed and flawed human beings’ understanding of what might, could and should be in the nature of God? I did not believe in the inerrancy of scripture any longer, but if I cannot completely trust the scriptural record to tell me who God is, then what other source of knowledge do I have? Am I simply left up to my own devices? And why should I trust my faith community? They are all just as human and situated and flawed as I am. A mental Chinese Finger Puzzle—for sure—the more I would pull on one end, the tighter I would feel squeezed on the other. In sheer pain and humiliation, I approached Dr. Fulkerson after class one day. I said to her, “The more we study in here, the more I feel like I am becoming an atheist. Human beings made everything up! This is all a bunch of crap! Nobody knows anything! And, the majority of the theology that we blindly accept as being ‘correct’ is just the human opinions of the richest, most powerful men who won the argument. Every day I feel like I get closer to becoming an atheist. I do not know what to do.”
Her response? “Stick with that.”
Ivory Tower theological answers to my questions did not fill my empty cup because they seemed contrived and convoluted. The rigors of seminary life did not fill my empty cup because reason and hard work are not enough to propel one over the hurdles of faith. Prayer, for the first time in my life, did not appear to be filling my empty cup because I was no longer convinced that there was a God actively listening and caring and knowing me by name. And I hated going to church because I felt like such an imposter. I could not be dissuaded from my suspicion that God might very well be a figment of our collective imaginations. The dread in my heart grew as I questioned my history, my experiences of God that had been on a more guttural level, the “miracles” of my life, my calling and then the most terrifying proposition came to me. Who would I be if I was not a Christian?
In Matthew 7:7 Jesus says, “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you.” I found myself, not for the last time, asking, seeking and knocking. The following semester I took a Pastoral Spirituality class with Father Phillip Leach, a local Catholic priest and closet evangelist, in the hope that the class might help me to sort out my atheistic dread. Seek and you will find. One night he preached a sermon instead of lecturing. I do not believe he planned it this way; for me it was a God Moment—a time when the only reasonable and understandable explanation is God worked in the hearts and minds of those present that night, including me.
The room was silent in that way where it feels like everyone is breathing together at the same pace and rhythm. He held everyone’s rapt attention, and yet my memory is that only Father Phillip and I were in that room. He was speaking to me and to me alone. Maybe everyone felt that way. He looked right at me and saw me, Jacqueline Hope Derby, the doubter, the questioner, the faithless, and he said:
Do you know why we believe that Jesus is God? The resurrection? Yes, Jesus rose from the dead. Yes, Jesus saves us from our sins, our stupidity, our fear, from ourselves—my little Baptists and my little Methodists who are always so worried about being saved from something. But what good is salvation to you today? Why do you care? Are you really going to tell me that you are obsessed on a daily basis with going to hell? Please! You are too busy fornicating for that! You can’t be bothered with hell today. You will face that if and when it comes. Anyways, you are saved; you have the right answers to the questions. ‘So, no, Father Phillip, we have no clue why we believe in Jesus.’ So, let me tell you. We believe that Jesus is God because of the cross. The cross! Are you listening? We KNOW that Jesus is God because right now someone is hanging on a cross. A dissident is facing a firing squad for speaking the truth—he is hanging on a cross. A child is starving to death—she is hanging on a cross. A woman is on the run from her abusive husband—she is hanging on a cross. A man is facing the end of his life and the fact that he spread HIV to his partner—he is hanging on a cross. We KNOW that Jesus is God because he is hanging on the cross with us. We do not suffer alone. The Holy One hung on that cross and suffered and bled and cried and was forsaken and abandoned by those whom he was sure loved him and would never leave. What cross are you hanging on today? What cross have you hung on? What cross will you hang on? Cause if you are going to be a minister let me just tell you that you will be hung out to dry—well, if you are doing it right you will be! Jesus, who lived, who loved, who triumphed on Easter morning over all that breaks us in two, is right here with you, suffering with you. Jesus is Emmanuel and that is the only thing that makes any of this make sense.
Emmanuel: “God with us.” God is with me. God has been with me all along. Everything clicked for me as I looked at that suffering Jesus on the cross and thought of all of the crosses of my life. Yes! Jesus was with me when I suffered the death of my father. Yes! Jesus was with me when my sisters abandoned our family. Yes! Jesus was with me when I was being molested. Yes! Jesus was with me when I could not go on and prayed for death. Yes! Jesus was with me when I was deemed the girl that you should not be friends with and a social outcast. Yes! Jesus will remain with me regardless of the cross I hang on, and so I can have faith in God not because God is a puppet master controlling my life, but because God intimately knows me and the difficult and beautiful road I walk down. When I break the bread and drink the wine, I join with my brothers and sisters as we sit at the table with Jesus right now. God with us right now.
As a hospital chaplain, I feel this is the first and most important Gospel, “good news,” that I have to offer. God is here. We are not alone. None of our pain has gone un-witnessed by the Holy Spirit. I know a great deal about crisis intervention, the Grief Spiral, intake history mapping, spiritual assessment and techniques to help people pick up their own coping skills, but this skill set is not my theology. My theology is Emmanuel under-girded with unwavering loyalty to my spiritual conviction that each and every one of us has been created in the image of God and that there is nothing that we can do or that can be done to us that can obliterate our lineage.
I cannot offer a systematic theology full of checks and balances. I have no tidy scientific way to explain the virgin birth, the resurrection or the power of the Holy Spirit, nor would I want to explain them in scientific terms for they are elements of my faith story, i.e. narrative. What I can only offer Emmanuel. I can only offer a lonely man in a garden sweating blood because he is so scared, and yet the same man who John brought out of the waters of the Jordon River with the Dove descending and the voice of God calling, “”You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.” I can only offer the One who promised that we do not have to be afraid, and the Biblical promise that nothing can separate us from the love of God. And these offerings are more than enough reason for me to believe that Jesus is in fact God. But knowing Jesus’ identity, even as Emmanuel, is not enough to teach me what it means to follow Jesus and be his disciple.
I do not want to simply admire Jesus for being a good and moral man. Admiration and discipleship are two completely different paradigms. Being a Christian is not the same thing as being a good person. My baptism sets a seal upon my heart and calls me to life anew. Being a Christian demands that I model my life after Jesus’ life and be open to God’s continuing revealing presence in my life…being open to God’s continual call to accountability. But what does God require of me? Micah 6:8 defines it this way, “He has told you, O mortal, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?”
But God does not just require this of me. God requires this of us. I am not a Lone Ranger Christian. I am a part of a community of faith where we struggle together to be more like Jesus and draw closer to the person God created us to be. When we gather at the communion table we declare our legacy: To Jesus and his disciples; to the Cloud of Witnesses who have gone on before us; and to the faithful who will link our generation to the future. The wider theological conversation through the ages now has such depth and meaning to me. I may push away from the narrow halls of systematic constructs, but the faith in which they are created connects me to the writers. Yes, they are just human beings like I am, but they are also seeking, knocking, asking just like I am. I can read Luther now and hold “brotherly speech with one whose thought I had not hoped to reach.” The conversation for me is not about locating “correct doctrine” but about being a part of the community of faith and about our shared eschatology—what we consider to be the enduring qualities of God. I also believe in God’s enduring promises, not just for the time of the historic Biblical record but for right now. I believe in God’s continuing revelation, so the broad theological conversation contains a located understanding of these promises, just as our work now reveals our own life stories and their engagement with these promises.
I maintain a prophetic baptist vision of what it means to be a disciple in that I believe my faithful life must be characterized by the faithfulness of Jesus who was and is and is to come. Like my historical Christian counterparts within our tradition, I do not stress doctrinal agreement as the way in which to form the blessed community of the faithful. But I do not want to imply that the life of the Christian is without accountability or without doctrine. I see this accountability and doctrine very clearly in our covenantal relationship with one another, our baptismal seal and our continuing open table practices. The scripture that defines the covenant for me is Matthew 22:36-40. The Pharisee and lawyer asks Jesus, “Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” Jesus replies, “’You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the greatest and first commandment. And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbour as yourself.’ On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”
I feel that I am coming of age as a minister during a time of warring bumper stickers proclaiming the “correct faith” one must have in order to be a faithful Christian. On the one hand there is the one I recently saw saying, “Do not put a question mark where God puts a period.” Counter that with our own God is Still Speaking campaign where we quote Gracie Allen saying, “Never put a period where God puts a comma.” We cannot even manage to love one another within the Christian community, so how can we begin to grasp the radical call to love and pray for those we might deem “other” or our “enemy?”
In the Luke version of Jesus’ being tested and asked to define the greatest commandment, he responds by telling the parable of the “Good Samaritan.” The Pharisee hoped to trick Jesus by asking him, “Who is my neighbour?” Jesus declares that the one deemed unclean, the Samaritan, was the neighbour. I believe in this kind of radical inclusion, and discipleship requires radical inclusion. As disciples we affirm, just as Paul did two thousand years ago, that ”there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” The Christian community is made up of equals before God. But, even in our equality, God calls out our individual names and requires different things of us. Some of what God requires is based on our gifts and the call to use those gifts. The body of Christ must actively utilize these gifts in order to be effective in our ministry of radical inclusion and care for our neighbour. Paul puts it this way in Romans 12:4-8:
Just as each of us has one body with many members, and these members do not all have the same function, so in Christ we who are many form one body, and each member belongs to all the others. We have different gifts, according to the grace given us. If a [person’s] gift is prophesying, let [them] use it in proportion to [their] faith. If it is serving, let [them] serve; if it is teaching, let [them] teach; if it is encouraging, let [them] encourage; if it is contributing to the needs of others, let [them] give generously; if it is leadership, let [them] govern diligently; if it is showing mercy, let [them] do it cheerfully.
Just as God requires us to use our gifts in service to one another, we are also required to resist evil as it manifests in our hearts and in our world. Discipleship does not end at the church door. I make my voice known in protest against the inhumane ways we treat one another, not because I label myself “liberal” or “progressive,” but because Jesus requires that my discipleship must “do to others as [I] would have them do to me.” I must resist the lure of “us versus them” because Jesus has told me to “pray for those who persecute [me].” Discipleship is not about being a good person, for God intimately knows my identity as God’s child and friend. In other words, I do not need to impress God with my goodness. But, in order to draw closer to the woman God created me to be, I have to practice radical loving and including those I perceive as my enemies, which I see as the hardest part of the greatest commandment. My neighbour truly is everyone on this planet, and loving them is not easy. This is why there is such a high personal cost to being a disciple. I have to come out from behind my false gods who lure me with their empty promises of security and whisper to me that I do not need a God who holds me accountable to my commitment as Jesus’ disciple.
Without this accountability I do not see how we can join Mary and proclaim God’s mercy, God’s righteousness, God’s redemption and God’s plan of reversal for those who are lowly. Yes, for me God is all about love, and that love asks me to love as I have been loved. Jesus is the greatest example of that love because he shows the beauty of the human life and that God suffers with us. We have been created in God’s image with intentionality and purpose. Our gifts are an extension of God’s creative force in our lives. We get to choose if and how we will use the gifts we are blessed with. We get to choose if and how we will love with the love we have been blessed with. Being a disciple is a choice; a choice I affirm for my life. The opportunity to turn, repent, reconcile and draw closer is always available. God is always there waiting with open loving arms to receive us. God has an enduring imagination regarding our lives and our potential to co-create beauty and peace in the world that God created for our delight. God has an enduring imagination regarding my life and calls me to co-create love and compassion in the world.
Recent Comments